We need to know what everyone needs, so that we have reasons for asking for money. The more detailed your group can analysis what it needs the better we will be able to ask for it and monitor how money is being spent.
We need to have potentially one other person (probably from the People’s Group) since they are the largest in the class to join the Capital’s group we only have 3 people total and myself (Scott) am also part of the other class, so it is important to have another person so the work load can be balanced better.
As towards a name for our firm I am ok with Clark & Young, referring to President Clark and BYU-I.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Learning Theory
Context for change
Last time in class we had the chance to talk about how things are changing at BYU-Idaho and how we become the source of the change. Is helping some of the students and teachers and other employees to adapt to the new strategy that university has.
How this applied to our groups?
• Needs of the other groups
• Rules within our group
• Service and surveys done with the groups
• Goals for our group
These are some of the things that might help us to group and move in a direction.
Project Team Development
Adjusting
Performing
Naming
Storming
Forming
In the technology department if we go with these plans these are some things we need to accomplish.
1. We need to for our group in the way that we will be able to see what is going on in our group but also to be able to represent the other group’s interest and know what is going on their side.
2. We need to come up with a lot of ideas and have them written down. Set a part each time we need for a five minutes where we could storm in a lot of ideas.
3. We need tot take these ideas and analyzed them to see which of them work and the rest drop them. Also keep our minds open for new ideas and plans of action.
4. We need to perform. Look for technologies and solution to better ways to do staff.
5. Adjusting with the other group ideas and solutions so that will make us very flexible and responsive to the organization itself.
Also I think that we need to be able to come with solutions very fast but also we need to make sure that we have people responsible for the work. A good example will be have a work that is done verified but three people before it becomes available to the group so in these way the error will be very low.
Post a Comment